Cherry Kim vs Seo Hyeon Jang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kim vs S. Hyeon Jang

Cherry Kim
KOR
l
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
25
Age
21
-
Height
-
896
C. Rank
0
875
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Seo Hyeon Jang
KOR
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
25
Age
21
-
Height
-
896
C. Rank
0
875
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kim 0 - 0 Jang
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kim | 0 |
| Jang | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
C. Kim vs S. H. Jang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Kim vs S. H. Jang Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cherry Kim has won 30.65% of points on their second serve, while Seo Hyeon Jang has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cherry Kim, in recent form, has won 56.60% of their opponent's second serve points, while Seo Hyeon Jang has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.96% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cherry Kim has saved 49.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Seo Hyeon Jang has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cherry Kim has won 63.93% of matches played (W/L 39/22), with Seo Hyeon Jang winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cherry Kim has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 10/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 3/3). Seo Hyeon Jang has their best career surface win % on , winning 71% (W/L /), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L /).
- Player level: In the last year, Cherry Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.00% of matches (W/L 33/17), where as Seo Hyeon Jang has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cherry Kim has played against opponents with an average rank of 391.3 while Seo Hyeon Jang has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cherry Kim has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Seo Hyeon Jang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cherry Kim has converted 46.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Seo Hyeon Jang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cherry Kim vs Seo Hyeon Jang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kim 40%, Jang 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kim 60%, Jang 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Kim 53%, Jang 0%.
C. Kim Recent Matches Played
S. H. Jang Recent Matches Played
Empty Result

C. Kim vs S. H. Jang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.33% (83/67) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 54.13% (177/150) | Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 51.41% (1512/1429) | Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.85% (70/60) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 71.43% (10/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 58 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 452 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 351.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 63% (3512/5573) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (2003/3512) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (781/2061) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (379/756) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (2722/5710) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.49% (23/20) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.07% (60/47) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (81/147) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 73% (11/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (17/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 91% (81/74) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 9% (81/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 12% (68/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
05:00 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.81
W2
1.87
04:35 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.52
W2
2.33
08:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.42
W2
2.61
11:30 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
4.15
W2
1.189
08:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
1.52
W2
2.33
01:00 PM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
3.8
W2
1.22
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
13 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Lorenzo Musetti Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 13th November 2025 Best Bets
13 Nov 2025
Taylor Fritz vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 13th November 2025 Best Bets
13 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Vit Kopriva Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 13th November 2025 Best Bets
13 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Taylor Fritz vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 13, 2025
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 6-3
16:00
H2H 7-1
04:35
H2H 0-0
07:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Spain
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal